In a Brazilian real estate development under the segregated estate regime (patrimônio de afetação), the project's money only stops belonging to the project when there is a surplus, that is, when it exceeds what is needed to finish the works and repay the construction loan.
6The rule is in Law 4,591/1964, art. 31-A, § 8, I, which also requires counting the amounts still receivable until completion. The person who runs that calculation, month after month and project by project, is the CFO.
The acronym stands for chief financial officer. In Brazil the role is usually called diretor financeiro, and in smaller companies the job sometimes falls to a partner.
This text describes the seat as IncorpBuilding sees it, from the developer's side: whoever buys the land, sells off-plan, raises the money and reports to buyers, lenders and tax authorities. The reading is IncorpBuilding's, marked as such; the laws cited are listed in the references at the end.
Three jobs tend to blur together in a developer's finance department. The treasurer pays and collects: schedules payments, reconciles bank statements, chases late instalments. The accountant keeps the books: records every event and closes the financial statements.
The CFO decides and answers: plans where the money will come from, when it will run short and what it costs to cover the gap.
The law separates at least one of these jobs clearly. The Civil Code requires a business company to keep an accounting system and to draw up a balance sheet and an income statement every year (art. 1,179). It also places bookkeeping "under the responsibility of a legally qualified accountant" (art. 1,182).
A CFO may be trained in accounting, but the seat is not the accountant's seat. Whoever signs the books answers for the records.
Whoever runs the finances answers for the decisions the numbers should have prevented: the launch with no cash to finish, the loan with a clause the company cannot meet, the tax that fell due with nothing set aside.
In IncorpBuilding's reading, the seat has four tasks. Plan the cash of each project, from land to handover. Raise money in the right order and at the right cost.
Check what is spent against what was budgeted. And inform, with the same number, whoever buys, whoever lends, whoever audits and whoever decides.
The segregated estate is the developer's choice to separate the land, the building and the funds of one project from the rest of the company (Law 4,591, art. 31-A).
The separate estate only answers for the debts of that development and does not mix with the developer's other assets or with other segregated estates (§ 1).
In financial terms, each segregated project becomes a small company inside the company. The law requires the developer to keep the assets of each development apart, to move the funds through a deposit account opened for that purpose and to keep complete accounting records, "even if exempted by tax legislation" (art. 31-D, II, V and VIII).
How the money is used also follows rules. The funds of the segregated estate pay or reimburse the expenses inherent to the development (art. 31-A, § 6).
The price of the land only returns to the developer as units are sold, in proportion to their land shares and only on amounts actually received (§ 7).
The surplus only leaves after the completion calculation: whatever exceeds what is needed to finish the works, counting the amounts receivable, and to repay the construction loan (§ 8, I).
For the CFO, this changes the monthly question. Knowing how much cash there is is not enough; the CFO must know how much of that cash is already spoken for.
The developer "is liable for the losses it causes to the segregated estate" (art. 31-A, § 2). Taking money from one project to cover another, even for a few days, is exactly the kind of loss the rule is meant to prevent.
A development spends and collects at different rhythms. Spending follows the works: it starts low, rises with the structure and the masonry, and falls during finishing.
Collections follow sales and credit: down payments and instalments from buyers during construction, drawdowns of the construction loan as the works progress and, at handover, the balance the buyer settles with own funds or a mortgage.
The cash flow per project is the table that puts those two curves side by side, month by month, until the keys are handed over.
The cumulative gap between them, in the worst month, is the project's cash requirement. That number tells the partners how much equity to put in, how much credit to seek and by what date.
Law 6,404/1976 lists the cash flow statement among the statements the executive board must have prepared at the end of each financial year (art. 176, IV).
The annual statement looks back. The CFO's cash flow looks ahead and is redone every month, with real sales, real costs and real drawdowns in place of the launch assumptions.
Three variables move that table more than the rest: the pace of sales, the pace of the works and the date each credit drawdown actually arrives.
The third tends to be the most underestimated. A late drawdown does not show up in the construction budget, but it does show up in the bank statement.
Partners' equity, buyers' payments and construction financing are the three classic origins. Each has a price and conditions. Equity charges no interest, but it expects a return and stays locked in until the surplus can leave.
Buyers' payments charge no interest, but they depend on sales and can come back through cancellations. Financing has an explicit cost and drawdown rules.
Under segregation, the law restricts collateral. The assets of the segregated estate may only secure a credit operation whose proceeds are "entirely allocated to the completion of the corresponding building" and to the delivery of the units (Law 4,591, art. 31-A, § 3).
If the developer assigns the receivables from sales, for instance to bring cash forward, the proceeds of the assignment also become part of the segregated estate (§ 4).
The lending bank watches closely. The financing institution may appoint someone to oversee the segregated estate, with access to the site, the books, the contracts and the account (arts. 31-C and 31-D, VII).
The loan agreement may also carry restrictive clauses, known as covenants: commitments measured by indicators, accounting or otherwise, that the company must meet while the debt is outstanding.
When the Brazilian Securities and Exchange Commission (CVM) issued guidance to listed developers in 2018, it listed among the control failures reported by auditors the "absence of monitoring and follow-up of restrictive clauses in loan and financing agreements".
Tracking covenants is the CFO's job: whoever learns of a breach from the bank has already lost the time to negotiate.
The long-term capital structure, meaning how much debt and how much equity the company is willing to carry, is a decision that goes up: to the CVO seat, where it exists, or to the executive board and the partners.
The CFO supports that decision with numbers and controls and warns, ahead of time, when it no longer fits the cash.
Law 10,931/2004 created the special tax regime for real estate developments, known as RET. It is "optional and irrevocable for as long as the developer's credit rights or obligations towards the purchasers remain" (art. 1) and requires, among other conditions, the segregation of the land and the building (art. 2, II). Without a segregated estate, there is no RET.
Under RET, the developer pays 4% of the monthly revenue received, as a single payment covering corporate income tax (IRPJ), PIS/Pasep, social contribution on net profit (CSLL) and Cofins (art. 4, as worded by Law 12,844/2013).
The base is the money that came in, including financial income and monetary adjustments from the operation (§ 1). The payment is final, with no refund or offset (§ 2), and falls due on the 20th of the following month, under the development's own tax ID (CNPJ) (art. 5).
Two details weigh on the CFO's work. The revenue, costs and expenses of a RET development stay out of the tax calculation for the company's other activities (art. 4, § 3).
And indirect costs paid in the month are split among developments in proportion to each one's direct costs (§ 4). Without direct costs properly allocated per project, the split comes out wrong.
Outside RET, the company's regime applies. Law 9,718/1998 allows companies with total gross revenue of up to R$ 78 million in the previous year to opt for the presumed-profit regime (art. 13), an option that is "final for the whole calendar year" (§ 1). Above that limit, the actual-profit regime is mandatory (art. 14, I).
Brazil's consumption tax reform has already touched this area: Complementary Law 214/2025 rewrote art. 3 of Law 10,931, which now mentions the new CBS and IBS taxes.
The CFO follows the transition project by project, because RET lasts as long as there are credits or obligations with buyers, and that spans years.
A developer selling apartments off-plan collects for years before delivering. The accounts must decide when that sale becomes revenue. The Brazilian standard on the subject is NBC TG 47, issued by the Federal Accounting Council and equivalent to pronouncement CPC 47 and to IFRS 15.
It allows revenue to be recognised over time when the company's performance creates an asset that the customer controls as it is created, or when the asset has no alternative use and the company has an enforceable right to payment for performance completed to date (item 35).
In that case, revenue follows the measure of progress (item 39), and one of the methods uses costs incurred (item B18).
The Securities and Exchange Commission addressed the topic in a 2018 circular letter to listed companies in the sector.
According to the text, keeping the percentage-of-completion method, known as POC, or adopting the "keys method", which recognises revenue at delivery, depends on the analysis of the contracts. The letter notes that POC generally uses the ratio between costs incurred and budgeted costs to allocate revenue.
Hence the practical consequence. If the budget is wrong, the revenue and margin of each period are wrong too.
The same letter states that POC requires "robust internal control systems, automation of accounting, recruitment of qualified staff". Under POC, the construction budget stops being an engineering document and becomes an accounting record.
The standard also guards against waste dressed up as progress. Costs of "unexpected amounts of wasted materials, labour or other resources" do not generate revenue (NBC TG 47, item B19, a). NBC TG 16, the inventories standard, follows the same line: abnormal waste leaves the cost and goes straight to expense (item 16, a). This is where the losses measured by the storekeeper reach the balance sheet.
Units not yet sold call for a different kind of attention. NBC TG 16 measures inventories at the lower of cost and net realisable value (item 9).
If the selling price falls or the cost to finish rises, the cost may no longer be recoverable (item 28). The CFO needs to see this before it shows up as a loss at closing.
Buyers want to know whether the works will finish on time with the money that exists.
That is why the law requires the developer to deliver to the buyers' representative committee, at least every three months, a report on the state of the works and how it matches the agreed deadline or the funds received in the period.
Trial balances matching the calendar quarter go with it, one per segregated estate (Law 4,591, art. 31-D, IV and VI).
Even without segregation, when the developer sells units with a fixed deadline and price, the law requires the report on the state of the works every 3 months (art. 43, I, a).
It also forbids adjusting unit prices because of rising material and labour costs, unless the adjustment is expressly provided for in the contract (art. 43, V). In that case the cost risk stays with the developer, and the CFO must price it.
The bank wants to know whether the credit is going to that project and whether the loan conditions are still met. The Federal Revenue Service wants the right tax under the right tax ID.
And Social Security wants the site's contributions paid: Law 8,212/1991 makes the developer jointly liable with the builder, "whatever the form of contracting the construction", with no benefit of order (art. 30, VI).
The same rule allows the developer to withhold amounts owed to the builder to secure those payments. For the CFO, the consequence is direct: paying the contractor without checking the site's social security payments means taking on the contractor's social security debt.
Then there are contract cancellations (distratos). In a segregated development, the law allows a penalty of up to 50% of the amount paid and a refund within 30 days after the occupancy permit (habite-se) (art. 67-A, § 5).
Without segregation, the penalty goes up to 25% (art. 67-A, II) and the balance is paid in a single instalment 180 days after the cancellation (§ 6).
The refund date goes into the cash flow; the penalty, into the cancellation's own account. The table summarises what segregation changes for the money.
| Item | With segregated estate | Without segregated estate |
|---|---|---|
| Where the money sits | Specific deposit account for the project (art. 31-D, V) | The developer's general cash |
| When the surplus may leave | Only what exceeds completion of the works and repayment of the construction loan (art. 31-A, § 8, I) | No art. 31-A rule; ordinary company management applies |
| Federal taxes | May opt for RET: 4% of monthly revenue received (Law 10,931, arts. 2 and 4) | Presumed profit up to R$ 78 million of revenue in the previous year, or actual profit (Law 9,718, arts. 13 and 14) |
| Reports to the representative committee | Report on the works every three months and calendar-quarter trial balance (art. 31-D, IV and VI) | Report on the works every 3 months, when sold with fixed deadline and price (art. 43, I, a) |
| Contract cancellation | Penalty up to 50% and refund within 30 days after the occupancy permit (art. 67-A, § 5) | Penalty up to 25% and single refund after 180 days (art. 67-A, II and § 6) |
| Developer's bankruptcy | The segregated estate stays outside the bankruptcy estate (art. 31-F) | If the works cannot continue, buyers are preferred creditors for what they paid (art. 43, III) |
An officer is not personally liable for obligations taken on in the company's name through a regular act of management (Law 6,404, art. 158). The protection covers a CFO who holds a director's office. It has exceptions, and several of them live in the finance department.
| Area | What the law says | What the CFO must ensure |
|---|---|---|
| Tax | Directors, managers or representatives are personally liable for taxes resulting from acts that exceed their powers or breach the law, the articles of association or the bylaws (CTN, art. 135, III) | Written powers, and taxes calculated and paid on time, under the right tax ID |
| Civil | Officers are jointly liable for fault in performing their duties (Civil Code, art. 1,016) | Each decision recorded with the number that supported it |
| Commingling of assets | Repeatedly paying a partner's obligations, or transferring assets without consideration, allows a court to reach the assets of officers and partners who benefited (Civil Code, art. 50, § 2) | No partner's bill paid by the company; intercompany loans only under contract |
| Segregated estate | The developer is liable for losses caused to the segregated estate (Law 4,591, art. 31-A, § 2) | Exclusive account, with no lending from one project to another |
| False information | A director of a developer or builder who makes a false statement about the construction in a report or balance sheet commits a crime against the public economy (Law 4,591, art. 65, § 1, I) | Trial balances and reports checked against the actual works |
| Omission | An officer answers for another's wrongdoing if complicit, negligent in discovering it or, knowing of it, failing to act (Law 6,404, art. 158, § 1) | Monthly reconciliation and a channel for whoever spots the problem to report it |
The CVM letter helps show where risk tends to start. Among the control failures reported by auditors are the lack of segregation of duties, delayed accounting for cancellations, the absence of reconciliation of balances for projects under construction and the lack of contracts for loans between related parties.
These are four entry points for the risks in the table, and all of them cross the CFO's desk.
The underlying duty is the same as for the rest of the board: the care and diligence of someone running their own business (Civil Code, art. 1,011).
In finance, diligence takes a concrete form: reconciliations done, accounts kept apart, approval limits respected and the reason for every out-of-pattern decision on record.
The CFO does not see the site; the CFO sees what arrives from it. In the structure IncorpBuilding describes, the CEO runs the company and its execution within the agreed direction, and the CFO and the COO, the chief operating officer, report to the CEO, each in their own area.
In structures that have a CVO seat, that seat looks after the long term and the direction. Four support seats feed the finance department with accurate information from the sites.
| Support seat | What the CFO receives | What it is used for in finance |
|---|---|---|
| General coordinator | Deadlines and physical progress of every site, in a single view | Spending curve, percentage of completion, likely credit drawdown date |
| Site administrator | Contracts, payroll, documents and social security payments for each site | Checking joint social security liability before paying the contractor |
| Supply management | Orders, prices, lead times and payment terms | Spending forecast and matching of order, invoice and payment |
| Storekeeper | Receipts, consumption and losses of material | Actual cost, with abnormal waste kept out of cost |
The match with supply management deserves one more line. In IncorpBuilding's reading, no payment to a supplier or contractor should go out without three documents agreeing: the order or contract, the invoice, and the approved progress measurement or physical receipt.
When the three do not agree, the problem lies in the works, the supplier or the records, and the CFO needs to know which before paying.
The example is hypothetical. The assumptions are the author's, chosen to make the arithmetic easy, and do not describe a real project.
A project under the segregated estate regime spends R$ 1.2 million a month on the works. Buyers pay R$ 0.4 million a month. Construction financing should release R$ 0.8 million a month as the works progress.
In the planned scenario, money in and money out match every month. In the real scenario, a missing document pushes the first drawdown to month 4, when the bank releases in one go the amount for the months already executed.
| Assumption or result | Loan on time | Loan released only in month 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Construction spending in months 1 to 3 (assumption) | R$ 3.6 million | R$ 3.6 million |
| Received from buyers in months 1 to 3 (assumption) | R$ 1.2 million | R$ 1.2 million |
| Released by the loan in months 1 to 3 | R$ 2.4 million | zero |
| Cash shortfall at the end of months 1, 2 and 3 | zero | R$ 0.8 / 1.6 / 2.4 million |
| Peak cash requirement | zero | R$ 2.4 million |
| Cost of covering the shortfall (assumption: 1.5% a month on each month's balance) | zero | R$ 72 thousand |
The cost calculation: balances of R$ 0.8, R$ 1.6 and R$ 2.4 million add up to R$ 4.8 million of monthly exposure; at 1.5% a month, that is R$ 72 thousand.
In month 4, R$ 3.2 million comes in from the bank and R$ 0.4 million from buyers, against R$ 1.2 million of spending, and the shortfall closes.
The R$ 72 thousand is the smallest problem. The bigger one is where the R$ 2.4 million comes from. Under segregation, the money cannot come from another project (art. 31-A, § 1), and the segregated assets only secure credit for that building (§ 3).
That leaves the partners' equity or the developer's own credit, and both must be arranged before the cash runs out.
A CFO who follows the loan paperwork together with the site administrator sees the missing document in the first month and asks for the equity with a deadline.
One who only watches the bank statement discovers the shortfall in the third month, when the choice is already between paying suppliers late and stopping the works.
No. The law requires a legally qualified accountant for bookkeeping (Civil Code, art. 1,182), not for the finance directorship. A CFO may be trained in accounting, economics, business or engineering. The CFO needs to master cash flow, credit, development taxes and the logic of the segregated estate, and to work with a qualified accountant who signs the books.
The treasurer executes: pays, collects, reconciles and chases. The CFO plans and answers: decides where the money will come from, when it will run short, what it costs to cover the gap and how to inform buyers, banks and the board. In small companies both jobs may fall to one person, provided whoever approves a payment is not the only one checking it.
No. The special regime of Law 10,931/2004 requires the segregation of the land and the building and the filing of the election form with the Federal Revenue Service (art. 2). The election is irrevocable while credits or obligations with purchasers remain (art. 1). Today the single payment is 4% of monthly revenue received (art. 4), and the consumption tax reform has already amended the law.
Not as a rule. The segregated estate does not mix with the developer's other assets or with other segregated estates (Law 4,591, art. 31-A, § 1). Only what exceeds the amount needed to finish the works and repay the construction loan leaves the estate (§ 8, I). And the developer is liable for any losses it causes (§ 2).
The decision on long-term capital structure goes up: to the CVO seat, in structures that have one, or to the board and the partners, as the articles of association or bylaws provide. The CFO prepares the numbers, shows the effect of each option on each project's cash and monitors the loan clauses after signing.
By IncorpBuilding
← Articles